I recently ran a training session for iTwin in Bentley Connect and when I ran the Clash Tool, I was asked, "How do we see who Manually Suppressed an identified clash?" I scrolled through the columns and there was no information showing this. I rai...

When a clash has been resolved through suppression, there's currently no way to identify who resolved the Clash through the suppression method. Columns have been set up for different information, but not for that. See attachments below.

During training users have asked that the singular clearance value entered in clash tests be separated into horizontal and vertical values. Their example is a test would be run to validate elements have at least 5" horizontal and 10" vertical clea...

Group clash detection results by conditions. Currently, iTwin design review uses the “cluster” option to group the clashes related to the same elements. More options are needed for the group view. Set Group clashes by Set A or Set B. We sometimes ...

Registering on behalf of COWI A/S When we register a Clash test, the “Include References” option is not enabled by default. This option was available by default in Clash V1 but not in V2, and it is now somewhat hidden. You need to go into the “Opt...

Problem Statement: Currently, the clash detection tool groups clashes into clusters, but these clusters are not numbered or uniquely identified. This lack of numbering makes it difficult for users to track and manage clusters, especially when deal...

On many of our large projects we use the iTwin clash detection engine extensively. We are dealing with large multi-discipline models. After the first initial test run, results are reviewed and Rule based suppression is applied to repetitive accept...

Some of our clash tests yield very large clash count totals ranging into the tens of thousands. A lot of these clashes are acceptable clashes that can be suppressed by a combination of rule based and manual suppression. The first step in clash det...